In the unfolding saga of Alexander Smirnov, we’re peeling back layers on what’s not merely a narrative of misinformation but a cunningly laid trap masterminded by operatives loyal to Obama. This intricate setup wasn’t just about throwing shade; it was a calculated move to throw off legitimate probes and smear the Republicans digging for the truth on pressing issues. Amidst this electrified backdrop, murmurs of a deeper dive by none other than Christopher Wray, the head honcho at the FBI, started making the rounds. Away from the media circus and the public eye, Wray, alongside a handpicked squad of FBI agents, was silently, yet doggedly, piecing together the puzzle of deceit. Their mission? It went far beyond debunking Smirnov’s bogus allegations. They were on a quest to untangle a complex web of guidance and manipulation that nudged Smirnov into the spotlight at a pivotal moment—June 2020, precisely when the FBI was dissecting the data on a laptop loaded with political dynamite. This covert operation hinted at a game much more significant than misleading the public. It was about wresting control of the narrative, unmasking the puppeteers orchestrating Smirnov’s entrance, and uncovering their endgame. The goal? To protect the sanctity of the investigative process and reveal the actual power brokers operating in the shadows of our government.

It is like they want to Triple Toe Loop us into another Russia Hoax.

Tore Maras

While the above preface around Alexander Smirnov and the alleged Obama-era machinations presents a tantalizing tale of intrigue and manipulation, it’s essential to tread carefully between the realms of possibility and concrete reality.

As it often does, the truth lies shrouded in the proverbial fog of war—a haze of conflicting information, partial truths, and strategic misdirection obscuring our view of actual events. What genuinely transpired might well diverge from this narrative. In reality, the investigation into Smirnov’s claims and the subsequent unraveling of a complex web of influence could reflect the chaotic, often opaque nature of political and intelligence operations.

The challenge lies not just in uncovering the truth but in navigating the murky waters where facts and fiction collide, where the motives of those in power are as hidden as their actions. My preface should serve as a stark reminder of the difficulties in discerning evident truths in the shadowy interplay of politics and intelligence, illustrating how the fog of war not only blinds but also distorts, leaving us to wonder about the reality behind the curtain of the official story.

Alexander Smirnov, an essential and regrettable reality, reflects on the treatment of genuine whistleblowers in contrast to manipulating public and political opinion through orchestrated setups. 

Alexander Smirnov has been a confidential human source for the FBI since 2010. The Russian figure skater Alexander Smirnov has been quite busy since 2020. Not only did he master the quadruple throw loop, but he also decided to moonlight as an FBI informant and provide a breath of life into RUSSIA COLLUSION. What actor is better to do this than a Russian figure skating informant? Talk about a triple axel of a career change! He provided information to the FBI about various matters, but his motivations and the exact nature of his relationship with the FBI are not publicly disclosed.

His testimony being taken at face value is a dichotomy that underscores a critical vulnerability in our accountability and governance systems, where the emphasis on credentials, affiliations, and political alignments often overshadows the essence of truth and integrity that whistleblowers aim to bring to light.

The Disregard for Genuine Whistleblowers

It is a lamentable aspect of the current political and social climate that real whistleblowers who come forward with genuine concerns and evidence of wrongdoing are frequently sidelined, discredited, or ignored. This issue stems, in part, from an overemphasis on the credentials and perceived motivations of the individuals rather than the substance of the information they provide. The case of Alexander Smirnov illustrates how easily the system can be manipulated when credibility is granted based on affiliations or the strategic value of the information rather than its factual accuracy or the public interest it serves.

This case study highlights a concerning parallel between high school social dynamics and the treatment of whistleblowers in the political and social arena. Just as popularity and the endorsement from well-regarded peers at the proverbial high school lunch table can elevate one’s status and credibility—often irrespective of their true character or contributions—so too can the world of political and social discourse grant undue credibility based on affiliations rather than the merit of one’s claims or evidence.

The case of Alexander Smirnov serves as a solid illustration of this phenomenon, where the system’s manipulation becomes evident. Credibility is awarded not on the substance of the information provided but on the whistleblower’s connections and the strategic value their claims might hold. This mirrors a psychological operation within societal and political contexts, where the focus on credentials and perceived motivations overshadows the actual importance of the information, sidelining genuine whistleblowers. The broader issue here is how societal structures can prioritize superficial markers of credibility over truth and integrity, much like the dynamics at play within the high school lunchroom.

The Pitfall of Credentialism

This case highlights a significant pitfall: the reliance on credentials and insider status as proxies for truthfulness. This reliance not only marginalizes genuine whistleblowers who may lack conventional credentials or insider access but also creates openings for malicious actors to exploit these biases for political or personal gain. By focusing on the superficial markers of credibility, the system inadvertently enables setups to occur in plain sight, where the real intentions and manipulations behind seemingly credible claims are obscured until it is too late.

PAWNS: Knowingly or Unknowingly

Senator Charles Grassley became an unwitting pawn in a far more complex and shadowy game than it appeared (or was he part of it?). Given the explosive information by Alexander Smirnov, Grassley, driven by a sense of duty and the urgency of the allegations, pushed for its release, placing immense pressure on the FBI, which is entangled in a web of suspicion and internal conflict.

According to sources at the FBI, Under Director Christopher Wray’s leadership, the FBI harbored deep reservations about the veracity of Smirnov’s claims. This was conveyed to us over brief conversations held in Washington, D.C., last week. Allegedly, within the Bureau, a specialized team was trying to piece together the true nature of Smirnov’s narrative. This group, comprised of astute agents skilled in counterintelligence, suspected that Smirnov was not acting alone but was instead a figurehead in a much larger scheme designed to manipulate public opinion and derail efforts to uncover genuine corruption. Are our sources credible?

It’s always MESSAGE over MESSENGER. That is the rule of thumb when analyzing information provided to you. We have been trained to develop more robust mechanisms for validating the information supplied by whistleblowers or sources, focusing on the evidence itself rather than the individual’s background or affiliations. Our investigation into the matter leads us to believe the information received as it has been consistent for years to be accurate and from a source of genuine concern.

Consequences and Missed Opportunities

The consequence of this bias towards credentials over content is twofold. First, it undermines the integrity of investigative processes, as genuine leads and critical information from whistleblowers without traditional credentials are overlooked or dismissed.

Second, it allows malicious setups, like the one involving Smirnov, to gain traction and influence public discourse and policy, often with far-reaching implications. These setups divert attention from real issues and erode public trust in institutions and the media, making it harder for the truth to emerge and for genuine whistleblowers to be heard.

The FBI’s reluctance to release Smirnov’s information publicly seems to be a calculated move. Director Wray and his team were acutely aware of the potential fallout from exposing what they believed to be a fabricated narrative. Their primary goal was to uncover the architects behind Smirnov’s involvement and understand the full scope of their intentions. However, the pressure exerted by Grassley and other political figures for transparency and accountability left the Bureau in a precarious position, caught between the imperatives of national security, the demands of political oversight, and the principles of truth and justice.

The operation behind Smirnov’s allegations was sophisticated, involving factions within the political landscape with agendas to manipulate public perception and safeguard their positions of power. This narrative manipulation not only fuels claims of unfounded impeachment inquiries but also serves to discredit whistleblowing, casting shadows of doubt over genuine claims of misconduct. This was INTENTIONAL.

Amplifying Contact in Today’s Interactions

Today’s hyperconnected world amplifies both the reach and the repercussions of whistleblowing. Social media and digital platforms can be powerful tools for whistleblowers to highlight injustices and mobilize public opinion. However, these same platforms can also be weaponized to discredit and harass those daring to come forward.

The Smirnov case exemplifies how easily manipulated narratives can overshadow genuine concerns. This phenomenon taints legitimate investigations and contributes to a culture of skepticism and cynicism toward whistleblowers, undermining efforts to address actual wrongdoing.

Moving Forward

Addressing the systemic neglect of actual whistleblowers requires a multi-faceted approach. Enhanced protections and support systems for whistleblowers are essential, ensuring they can come forward without fear of retribution. 

Moreover, institutions and the media must prioritize the integrity of the information over sensationalism, applying rigorous verification standards before amplifying allegations. Hence, why many whistleblowers have simply relied on using social media to “opine” and express information they consider critical to justice and domestic tranquility as they are aware that there are VERY good people working within our government that wish to end the Fourth Unelected Branch of Government control of the populous and diminishing sovereignty that contradict all oaths of office.

Transparency and accountability mechanisms must be strengthened, not just within governmental bodies but also within private corporations and organizations. Public awareness and education on the importance and value of whistleblowing in safeguarding a constitutional republic and ethical conduct in public and private sectors are crucial.

Now What?

The exposure of this elaborate scheme, while vindicating the FBI’s cautious approach, also raised unsettling questions about the integrity of the processes and the vulnerability of the nation’s institutions to manipulation by those with access to the levers of power. The saga of Alexander Smirnov is a cautionary example of the dangers of unchecked influence, the perils of misinformation, and the critical importance of vigilant, independent oversight to safeguard the principles upon which the republic stands.

The arrest of Alexander Smirnov (indictment), in the context of fabricating allegations, could have a complex impact on the perception of actual information regarding crimes found on a laptop. This situation encapsulates a multifaceted issue of credibility, misinformation, and public trust in investigative processes.

Alexander Smirnov getting nabbed for spinning tales about allegations threw a big, murky cloud of doubt over everything else, including those juicy bits found on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Picture this: Smirnov’s yarns were all tangled up in a bigger story that also whispers about some laptop dirt. Now, with him being called a liar, folks are also starting to side-eye the laptop story, wondering if there’s any truth or if it’s just more smoke.

And here’s the kicker—when an informant like Smirnov gets busted for making stuff up, it doesn’t just look bad on him. It makes everyone start questioning the whole system. What else are they missing if the powers that be were duped by Smirnov? Or worse, ignoring? That trust we’re supposed to have in those digging for the truth starts to crumble, and that doubt doesn’t pick and choose; it spreads, making us second-guess other investigations that might be on the up and up.

Let’s not get it twisted; separating the wheat from the chaff is critical here. The big brains behind the scenes and those reporting on it must draw a clear line between Smirnov’s make-believe and the real dirt on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Muddling the two makes a hot mess that helps nobody but the folks who thrive on chaos.

This whole debacle? It’s a golden ticket for those in charge to show us they’re not just about the badge and the title. By laying all the cards on the table, showing us the hand they’ve got that proves what’s in the laptop—apart from Smirnov’s circus—they’ve got a shot at winning back some of that trust they’ve been losing. It’s about showing the work, proving that they’re not just going through the motions but are genuinely committed to sifting through the noise to find the signal.

In a twist that feels all too familiar, the saga of Millie Weaver echoes the pitfalls of navigating truth in a landscape muddied by personal interests and financial motivations. This is my personal experience, and the similarities are profound.

Just like the unraveling of Alexander Smirnov’s tale, Weaver’s journey took a turn when the anticipated financial gain from exposing truths brought forward by a non-traditional whistleblower—yours truly—didn’t materialize as expected. This shift in her narrative trajectory sheds light on a disheartening reality: the quest for truth is often overshadowed by the lure of profit and self-preservation.

Much like Smirnov’s, Weaver’s actions contribute to the ever-expanding fog of war in the realm of information and truth. Her initial endeavors, which laid the groundwork for numerous investigations, now stand tainted by the revelation that the pursuit of money could trump the pursuit of truth.

This revelation not only casts a shadow over her past work but also amplifies a broader issue within the realm of investigative journalism and whistleblowing. It serves as a stark reminder that financial incentives can, and often do, muddy the waters of genuine discourse, leading those who once sought to illuminate the truth to instead add to the confusion, all for a price.

The implications of such actions are far-reaching. They undermine individual credibility and erode public trust in the sources of information that many rely on to make informed decisions and understand the world around them. The quest for truth becomes even more challenging in this environment, where motivations are questioned, and genuine efforts are obscured by those seeking personal gain.

In reflecting on these dynamics, it becomes clear that the integrity of information and the noble pursuit of uncovering truth are precious commodities in today’s world. The actions of individuals like Weaver, influenced by personal gain, highlight the importance of discernment and the need for a steadfast commitment to truth above all else. As we navigate through the fog of war in the information age, let us remain vigilant, constantly questioning, always seeking, and never allowing the price of truth to be outweighed by the allure of profit.

Drawing inspiration from the themes of betrayal found in the most-read poem by President Trump: “The Snake” poem, this report underscores a poignant lesson: the perpetuation of malevolence, deceit, and malice is not autonomous—it thrives on acquiescence.

Engaging with, endorsing, and financially backing those who manipulate and conceal the truth, akin to the serpent’s betrayal, underpins the issue’s essence. Reflecting on President Trump’s strategy to disengage from influencers while acknowledging their presence offers a masterstroke in navigating the treacherous waters of information warfare.

April 30, 2017

It encourages a stance of vigilant observation and critical discernment, allowing us to see beyond the facade and recognize the serpent in the grass, thereby refusing to be complicit in the acts of betrayal that seek to undermine our collective integrity.

Underneath the public spectacle and media frenzy, a quiet, meticulous investigation into the very fabric of this deception is allegedly underway. The focus is not just on Smirnov’s spurious claims but on unraveling the network of influence and coaching that led him to step forward at a critical juncture—June 2020, coinciding with the FBI’s examination of the contents of a politically sensitive laptop. This is reminiscent of the RUSSIA HOAX. What better plant to use than a Russian Double Agent FBI informant to give way to the narrative and bolster the false claims that Hunter Biden’s Laptop is Russian Disinformation?

Like my work, you can tip me or support me via TIP ME  or HERE or support me on Subscribestar! Follow me on Rumble and Locals or click below to subscribe through my site. I am 100% people-funded.

Leave a Reply

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Subscribe to newsletters to get latest posts in your email.