The outgoing administration’s decision to engage in a prisoner swap with China and reduce travel advisory warnings raises concerns about ulterior motives and long-term national security implications. While often framed as diplomatic gestures, these actions may encourage adversarial powers and complicate the incoming administration’s foreign policy stance. If strategically timed, this maneuver could sow confusion, weaken America’s leverage, and create chaos during the transitional period, undermining efforts to establish a unified and robust approach toward a declared adversary.
A former Chinese student at a Chicago college, Ji Chaoqun, convicted of espionage-related charges, has returned to China as part of a high-profile prisoner exchange. Ji had been serving an eight-year sentence for transmitting sensitive information about eight naturalized U.S. citizens—many of whom were defense contractors—to Chinese intelligence. These individuals, originally from China or Taiwan, were targeted due to their potential access to classified U.S. defense projects.
Ji’s case exemplifies a typical pattern in modern espionage. In 2016, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserves under a program designed to recruit foreign nationals with critical skills, concealing his contacts with Chinese intelligence on his application. U.S. officials revealed that Ji planned to use his military identification to access sensitive sites like aircraft carriers. He eventually secured a position at agencies such as the CIA, FBI, or NASA, leveraging his intended U.S. citizenship and security clearance to further China’s intelligence objectives.
His arrest in 2018, following meetings with an undercover agent posing as a representative of China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS), uncovered a broader espionage network. Ji’s handler, Yanjun Xu, was also convicted of stealing trade secrets from GE Aviation and recently completed a 20-year sentence for espionage.
Espionage as a Persistent Global Practice
Ji’s case, while alarming, is not unusual in international espionage, where exploiting education, immigration, and employment systems is a well-documented strategy. Espionage remains a tool for nations to secure strategic advantages, especially in military and technological innovation. Other widely known examples include:
- Jonathan Pollard (Israel): A U.S. Navy intelligence analyst convicted in 1987 for passing classified information to Israel, demonstrating how even allied nations conduct espionage.
- Anna Chapman and the Russian “Illegals” Program: Uncovered in 2010, this group of Russian agents embedded in American society covertly gathered intelligence for their home country.
- Chinese Industrial Espionage Cases: These are part of a broader pattern, including the 2020 conviction of a Chinese national for stealing sensitive agricultural technology from Monsanto and cyber intrusions attributed to China targeting companies like Equifax.
Why This is “Par for the Course”
Espionage cases like Ji Chaoqun’s underscore a well-worn playbook in the intelligence world:
- Educational Infiltration: Foreign students use study opportunities to embed themselves and build pathways to sensitive sectors.
- Industrial Targeting: Countries prioritize obtaining trade secrets or defense technologies.
- Recruitment of Vulnerable Individuals: Naturalized citizens or those with foreign family ties are often targeted for coercion or incentivization.
Diplomatic resolutions, such as prisoner swaps, are also common. The exchange of Ji and Xu for three Americans detained in China mirrors Cold War-era swaps, like the 1962 exchange of U.S. pilot Francis Gary Powers for Soviet spy Rudolf Abel.
Espionage reflects a global competition for knowledge, power, and security—one that is unlikely to diminish in an increasingly data— and technology-reliant world. Ji’s story is a reminder of these covert struggles’ persistent and evolving nature.
The White House said on Wednesday that China released U.S. citizens Mark Swidan, Kai Li, and John Leung, and the U.S. changed its travel advisory for China, lowering its risk warning, a move long sought by Beijing that U.S. officials have tied to China’s detention of American nationals.
Why would Biden relax travel advisories now during the transition period?
If you like my work, you can tip or support me via TIP ME or subscribe to me on Subscribestar! Follow and subscribe to me on Rumble and Locals, or subscribe to my Substack. I am 100% people-funded.
