Opinion| USAID FUNDING & The Hypocrisy of Selective Outrage

Plausible deniability is not proof of innocence—it is the very mechanism by which financial corruption operates.This is the foundation of money laundering. The whole point is to pass funds through multiple hands, making it difficult, if not impossible, to track the true origin of the money.

U.S. FUNDING OF A CANADIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY—BLACK BUDGET OPERATIONS OR SYSTEMIC FRAUD?

At the core of this matter lies a fundamental question: How does a publicly funded institution in one sovereign nation receive such substantial and sustained financial support from a foreign government without transparency or formal disclosure?

IC Series| USAID, NED, and OTI as The Soft Power War At Home

I keep seeing the lazy narrative that USAID was just funding Democrats—wrong. This isn’t about party politics; it’s about power. USAID, through OTI, funnels money to both sides via NDI (Democratic) and IRI (Republican) because, at the highest levels, it’s a uniparty operation.

Beyond the FBI and DOJ: It’s the Judges Who Must Answer

This is not just about January 6. It is about the future of the Republic. If the judiciary is lost to partisanship, there is no recourse left. If we fail to act, we will have surrendered the last institution capable of defending the American people from government abuses. The judiciary is on trial. And if justice is to be served, the judges who have betrayed their oath must be the first to face judgment.

Ohio’s Unconstitutional AI Agenda: Governance by Algorithm

I am taking legal action, but together, we must restore the balance of power and reaffirm that government exists to serve the people—not to govern by automation or convenience.

The Invisible Enemy: How the World Was Conquered Without War Series (IV)

As a teacher, history reveals patterns that those who study and learn from the past refine into strategies for global dominance.

Fear of the Future: Why Elon Musk and X Are Symbols of Tribalistic Backlash

Performative tribalism takes this one step further. Here, participants engage not to discuss or debate but to signal loyalty to their group or ideology. The goal becomes less about truth or progress and more about garnering clout, solidifying alliances, and attacking perceived outsiders. This behavior was evident yesterday as the discussion descended into name-calling, posturing, and unproductive theatrics undermining the original topic.