Advertisements

RUSSIA HOAX| PART I: NO DEFENSIVE BRIEFING

Tore
Facebooktwittermail

IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS| OBLIGATORY

This multi part series investigative report on the Russia Hoax was inspired with the lack luster analysis from supposed seasoned pundits and political analysts. Some have gone far enough (outside of the usual FAKE NEWS) to speculate that General Flynn had Russian ties compromising the Trump Administration. Documentation available to the public (there is more) indicate that he DID NOT for those that know what to look for.

I will break it down- showcasing exactly what is being muddled (intentional?). This first part will tell you the most apparent and most evident conclusion. In short the lack of the defensive briefing indicates that there were no National Security Concerns. This is very important because if there was intentional omission of a defensive briefing then that is an impeachable offense.

To understand this better and offer clarity it’s important understand the FLYNN situation and what an integral component is was to their failed coup. To do that we must determine what people may be responsible for all these leaks and insane coordination of attack against a sitting President, some are still hidden in plain sight. This part will give you the end game to help work back and part II will parse the Flynn Case only. The consecutive parts will showcase a very remedial, aggressive and almost immature plan to subvert our electoral process. In all honesty, I would have done a better job. Though, when you have the megaphone and feeble antagonistic conservative political analysts you get boisterous and underestimate the free citizens watching.

The FBI, CIA, DNI etc were NOT directly responsible to provide a defensive briefing to the incoming administration. It’s pedestrian to think that Comey would be providing a Defensive Briefing on National Security unless he was instructed to do so. His job was to tell the newly sworn in President that there were ongoing investigations which he did – kind of. But he didn’t do that during the transitional period because he was DIRECTED not to. What Comey can and can’t do during the Presidential Transition Period is determined and coordinated by others.

Nevertheless, Comey knowingly broke the law; leaking, lying, obstructing justice, destroying evidence, falsifying federal documents, making knowingly false statements and much more. So much more that I can be here all day like a prosecutor at SDNY on their first day finding anything under the sun to add to the list of charges for the sake of it – because that’s how detrimental of a spot he is in.

It is bizarre that it is being purported to the public that Comey, Lynch, Clapper or Brennan were directly responsible to provide defensive briefings during Trump’s Transitional Period. They were not.

What people don’t realize is that a DEFENSIVE BRIEFING to the incoming President is coordinated by the White House Transition Coordinating Council. It’s imperative ANY identified, ongoing or possible threats to our nation’s National Security are conveyed BEFORE the new Administration takes office because it is a matter of National Security (NATSEC). Having said that, it means that maybe there were not any NATSEC threats and they were manufactured because the Pentagon would have been also responsible to covey according to their own 2017 transition guidelines.

According to BHO Executive Order for Facilitation of a Presidential Transition dated May 6, 2016 the following people are responsible for coordinating the transition:

  • Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff who shall serve as Chair;
  • Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, who shall serve as Vice Chair;
  • Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Implementation;
  • Counsel to the President;
  • Assistant to the President for Presidential Personnel;
  • Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs;
  • Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism;
  • Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and Director, National Economic Council;
  • Director of National Intelligence;
  • Director of the Office of Management and Budget;
  • Administrator of General Services;
  • Federal Transition Coordinator;
  • the transition representative for each eligible candidate, who shall serve in an advisory capacity; and
  • any other executive branch official the President determines appropriate

Above are the faces of the two primary individuals ultimately responsible according to the EO of May 6, 2016 to convey the directive for a defensive briefing and delegate if they don’t do it themselves IF and ONLY IF they received such order from the President of the United States – Barack Hussein Obama. A defensive briefing was provided to Hillary Clinton in August of 2016 according to my sources, but the CHAIN OF COMMAND failed to order a defensive briefing to the Trump Transitional Team even after President Trump was elected.

Presidential Transition Act of 1963

The Act itself had two specific purposes.

  • To “promote the orderly transfer of the executive power in connection with the expiration of the term of office of a President and the inauguration of a new President.”
  • To reduce the need for the incoming President and Vice President to raise money for the transition period because it is clearly defined as a PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY.

The statute is clear :

Any disruption occasioned by the transfer of the executive power could produce results detrimental to the safety and well-being of the United States and its people.

Presidential Transition Act of 1963

In other words a defensive briefing is mandatory for any incoming administration especially if there are concerns of National Security otherwise it is putting the well-being of the American people at risk . It is the responsibility of the PREVIOUS administration’s transition team to do so upon the order of the exiting President. Thus the question of WHY such a briefing didn’t occur is important.

Last year I reported via Big League Politics that Judge Collyer was VERY distraught with the s.702 certifications and the abuse of surveillance of Obama’s Intelligence Community, FBI and Justice Department. As always the usual suspects Lynch, Clapper, Comey, and Brennan were named and discussed in her September 2016 scathing Memo – BUT that didn’t stop her from signing off on their phony, doctored, illegitimate FISA warrants a couple of weeks later. I wonder how she is still on a bench? Not like John Carlin’s s.702 certifications filed satisfied her concerns and her order. His claim of “algorithm errors and or human errors” that had yet to be rectified was a dance around – this is why he was RESIGNED. He took one for the team after all the Weiner emails just popped up which means HER chances of winning were dropping fast.

In fact it at that time in September is when Carlin petitioned to the FISA court for another extension. In summary, he claimed they are working on trying to stop spying unauthorized on citizens (what?). In good faith the judge allowed it. Collyer has so much good faith she also gave two more extensions to “fix” their spying problem one in December of 2016 just as Obama expedited UN SEC Council vote! #Convenient How is she still on the bench? Carlin resigned and the “amazing” Mary McCord took over. (I will circle back to Mary in Part II) They really thought Hillary Clinton would win – imagine just how fixed the election was and President Trump STILL won.

[Mary McCord]

Unbeknownst to many Carlin lead the attack on General Flynn years ago and this is why he was quickly appointed to Assistant AG of the National Security Division (NSD) at the DOJ and the longest serving one too! It’s important to note Carlin’s position is politically appointed and Lisa Page noted that during her testimony. Why is this important? Carlin led the charge to RESIGN General Flynn making Brennan, Clapper and BHO very happy. Why? It’s classified – but what I can say is that most Intelligence Community (IC) elements have a moral compass. General Flynn was honest, kind and morally sound. That is a feat in itself considering that at some point in a military career especially when stars get pinned politics are inevitable. He did an outstanding job balancing both worlds that tip in very different directions. The Interest of American citizens vs the Interests of the Administration. I believe that maybe for the first time in history we finally have a President where his Administration’s interests are the Interests of the American people.

John Carlin joined the National Security Division in 2009, only three years after it was established to consolidate the Justice Department’s national security and intelligence functions, and was confirmed as head in 2014. | Getty

It’s important to note that Carlin served as the chief of staff to then-FBI Director Robert Mueller bringing more wood to the fire that Mueller’s appointment was planned prior to the inauguration, right Rosenstein?

General Flynn Surveillance Over 36 months prior to Kislyak Conversations

Carlin – passed the torch to Mary McCord who was the one who “ACCIDENTALLY” found evidence of conversation(s) -between Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador and General Flynn. Though, even before those nothing burger December 2016 conversations were had, Carlin was under heat for surveillance of General Flynn. In essence the conversations which were not illegal, not against the interest of the people and not a NATSEC concern took the front seat to JUSTIFY their illegal surveillance for the past 36 months. The surveillance on General Flynn, Carter Page, George Papdopoulos and MANY more (according to sources) were done ILLEGALLY and that is demonstrated by their criminal conspiracy to entrap them with hearsay, manufactured 302s of those involved in the criminal conspiracy, obstructing justice, orchestrating the special counsel appointment and oodles of falsifying federal documents and false testimony.

SPYING on General Flynn

Even though the General had retired he was still an ACTIVE asset with the NSA. This allowed BHO to keep tabs on the General to extrude possible actions or communications no matter how thin and circumstantial but nonetheless insurance policies that he may derive and orchestrate to create a leash. Insurance policies vary. Some are compromising pictures, affairs, sexual preferences, your children or family other times more “covert ways” are implemented such as, selling your identification to illegal migrants or foreign entitites, depending on the insurance policy degree it could be for simply keeping your finances in check or to a cartel implicating you in tons of legal actions indirectly that can clap back at a given notice; It could be setting up meetings where known foreign agents are as to create foundations of espionage grounds queries; You don’t have to have a conversation discussing intelligence or NATSEC matters, sometimes simply being in the same room with them and a bunch of “302s” is all it takes.

Why was Flynn the target? That can be answered by BHO. Maybe he can tell us the truth about the tiff. Why was General Flynn resigned? We can also ask Brennan and Clapper – they know. They were so glad he was RESIGNED. The public knows General Flynn was the first to raise concerns about Radical Islamic Terrorism on a public platform which Obama refuted and said it wasn’t a problem and inferred malice on behalf of General Flynn- but the General was right. As reported by Politico :

One other senior commander had been scheduled to speak at Flynn’s retirement ceremony but canceled at the last minute: General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Later that same day, August 7, 2014, the reason for Dempsey’s absence became clear. Obama announced that U.S. warplanes had begun bombing ISIS targets, and U.S. troops would soon be dispatched back to Iraq. So Flynn had been right all along: The global war against radical Islamist terrorists was far from over.

Admiral Mike Rogers the Director of the NSA at General Flynn’s retirement ceremony praised the General.

General Flynn is the best intelligence officer of the past 20 years.

Admiral Mike Rogers at General Flynn’s Retirtement Ceremony

Collectively from media and known actors it is important I point out the judiciary concerns I have. One of my top five alarming incidents in the courts aside from Collyer still sitting on a bench, the other signature happy FISA court judges, Chief Justice Roberts’ discussions with Obama in January of 2017 is the statement of Judge Ellis :”TREASON” which he walked back but deserved nothing short of being fired on the spot. Judicial Prejudice is a HUGE concern especially when they are trying someone for what is known to be FALSE, FABRICATED and a COMPELLED PLEA. There are many judges that involve politics into the law which is putting your whole arse on the scale not just a thumb.


It’s important we observe the LOGAN ACT that the left thrusts every now and then and people seem to have misconceptions of what it really is.

THE LOGAN ACT

Logan Act, legislation enacted by the United States Congress (1799) that forbids private citizens from engaging in unauthorized correspondence with foreign governments. As amended, the act reads:

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.

The Logan Act is operative and constitutional, it can be argued that it doesn’t cover people with an official or quasi-official status in the U.S. government even if they are not speaking on behalf of the executive branch. In fact the Act applies to persons who act “without authority of the United States.”  The Trump Administration was ELECTED by the people thus in fact had authority of the United States and a quasi-official status. After all, it was the incoming Administration. Thus the Logan Act is not applicable to the Trump Administration during the Transition Period and all members that were incoming to work within the new Administration at that time UNLESS those persons were acting against the interests of National Security. It’s evident that no harm to the interests of the UNITED STATES can be substantiated or demonstrated but simply allegations that some persons may have spoken with people who were somehow indirectly or directly linked with another country.

Notably, after President Trump swore in many Obama Administration Executive Officials, former President Obama and even former Directors of the Intelligence Community who were at the time PRIVATE CITIZENS that have NO AUTHORITY to act on behalf of the United States were doing just that- Going against the interests of the people and had the audacity to publicly dispute the new administration’s policies. In essence, causing harm to the image of our nation by weakening it’s global image of position of power. If anything we should enforce the Logan Act because Obama, Kerry, Biden, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, Tillerson (funny how he got away) et al all are in violation of the Logan Act. #Deflection


Don’t get me wrong, I would love to blame Comey, Clapper and Brennan for NOT providing the defensive briefing to the Trump Administration but I can’t. It’s all about the CHAIN OF COMMAND. It was down to President OBAMA and those appointed as part of the Presidential Transition Team to do so under his direction.

The lack of defensive briefing in the matters of Russia “meddling”, alleged “compromised” members of the Trump Administration or campaign indicate that there were no CREDIBLE NATSEC concerns.

If there were valid NATSEC concerns then the lack a of DEFENSIVE BRIEFING is in an IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE. Barack Hussein Obama can be retroactively IMPEACHED for failing to abide by Presidential Transition Act of 1963 and therefore 18 U.S. Code § 2381. As stated failing to offer a defensive briefing can be detrimental to the safety and well-being of the United States and its people.

If there were no NATSEC concerns then why did they spy? If they were NATSEC concerns why didn’t Obama order a defensive briefing to the Trump Transition Team at minimum after President Trump was elected? Both cannot be true and both carry different penalties.

Here is where it get’s very interesting and substantiates every single statement in PART I of my Russia Hoax Analysis. The Defensive Briefing was to be provided at the DIRECTION of the then President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama. Below is Loretta Lynch’s closed door testimony as reported by Sara Carter. Other testimony we have seen clearly state that President Trump was NOT the target of any investigation but indicate that his campaign members and or transition team were, thus he should have received a defensive briefing.

In her testimony, Lynch makes it clear that BHO was the one giving direction not her ina careful manner due to the “nature” of the information. In addition, she kept repeating that the defensive briefing was an option when the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 and all Executive Orders since then including Obama’s don’t state it as an option but IMPERATIVE for National Security.

The statute is clear :

Any disruption occasioned by the transfer of the executive power could produce results detrimental to the safety and well-being of the United States and its people.

Presidential Transition Act of 1963

Sources tell me Impeachment Proceeding preliminaries are underway and it’s important that we keep leaks to a minimum. START is a good place to originate such investigations especially when the position requires constant parler with media organizations around the world. To many of us the leaks are what we crave for, our bread and butter (including me), but the impeachment proceedings of Obama though a victory for #1776Freedom it is nonetheless a huge stain on our country’s history. That is nothing to be proud of because each and every one of us are responsible for allowing it to happen to a certain extent.

Part II of RUSSIA HOAX Investigative Report will be up shortly at this LINK when updated.

Follow Tore on Twitter and Gab
Follow Haley Kennington on Twitter and Gab!
Listen to Tore Live on Red State Talk Radio– Her latest show archived HERE

Facebooktwittermail
twitterrss
Advertisements
Next Post

Kremlin Hints of Trump-Putin Sideline Talks in Osaka

Today it was suggested by the Kremlin that it is very likely for a brief conversation to be held between President Donald J. Trump and President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines during the G20 Summit in Japan. An official meeting has not been set by the White House to date […]

Subscribe US Now

%d bloggers like this: