Imagine if your hat could read your mind—like really read it—and then beam those thoughts straight to an ad company that decides you need three air fryers, a dating app for introverts, and socks that tell jokes. That’s kind of where we’re headed with brainwave-reading gadgets that tap into something called LFOs—those low-frequency brain signals that reveal if you’re bored, excited, or secretly craving nachos. These wearables can track your emotional state and use it to serve you perfectly timed ads, sometimes without you even knowing. But fear not! Enter the One Big Beautiful Bill—think of it as a legislative bouncer in sparkly shoes, swatting away creepy foreign ad companies trying to sneak into your headspace and sell you things based on your subconscious. It’s Uncle Sam saying, “Hey, no mind control without consent, and no shady foreign data harvesters peeking into our feels!”
You might think this sounds like science fiction—like something out of a Black Mirror episode—but it’s not coming; it’s already here. As Yuval Noah Harari warned at the World Economic Forum, “humans are now hackable animals,” And he’s not wrong. Let me show you just how hackable it is.
In an East London office, brands such as Nike, Bentley, and Mars are utilizing “neuroaesthetics” to enhance their advertising. The technique involves wearing an EEG headset, developed by Kinda Studios, which reads brainwave activity to gauge emotions and display them as swirling colors—yellow for joy, red for anger, blue for sadness, and green for relaxation. This technology acts as advanced consumer research, improving products and environments, including shopping centers and videos. Neuroscientist Erica Warp highlights the significant role of emotions in driving consumer actions and the potential of AI in further analyzing brain data. Brands like Mars have successfully used this technology, achieving improved ad effectiveness.
This isn’t just about selling you more candy bars or luxury cars; it’s about accessing your subconscious to influence your decisions. The One Big Beautiful Bill steps in here, acting as a legislative safeguard against such invasive practices. It aims to protect citizens from unauthorized mind control and prevent foreign adversaries from exploiting these technologies to manipulate public opinion and behavior.
So, while it may sound like a dystopian fantasy, the reality is that the tools to hack human emotions and thoughts are already in use. It’s scary—deeply so—but what’s more disturbing is the eerie silence that surrounds it. The truth is, the ability to use low-frequency oscillations (LFOs) to influence or even entrain human cognition and emotional states isn’t some fringe conspiracy—it’s been studied, funded, patented, and now commercialized. And yet, barely a whisper in public discourse. Why?
Because the tools of persuasion are now tools of precision, and they’ve quietly migrated from lab benches into ad agencies, Silicon Valley platforms, defense contracts, and consumer headsets. LFOs interact with brainwave states, such as theta and alpha, which govern memory, attention, and suggestibility. When synchronized through audiovisual stimuli or haptic feedback from wearables (yes, the ones you wear “for your wellness”), they can alter mood, reinforce impulses, and—under certain conditions—amplify compliance.
APPLE INC.
Apple has filed a patent for next-generation AirPods that could monitor brain activity using embedded sensors. This technology involves placing electrodes within the AirPods to measure biosignals such as electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and electrooculography (EOG). The system is designed to dynamically select subsets of electrodes to capture accurate readings based on individual user characteristics and conditions.
The patent, titled “Biosignal Sensing Device Using Dynamic Selection of Electrodes,” suggests that these AirPods could serve as discreet health monitoring devices, capturing data related to brain activity, muscle movement, eye movement, heart function, and more. This development aligns with Apple’s broader interest in integrating health-focused features into its wearable devices.
While the primary aim appears to be health monitoring, the capability to track and analyze brain activity raises questions about potential applications in areas like personalized advertising and user engagement. As such, technologies become more prevalent, discussions around privacy, consent, and ethical use are increasingly important.
One Big Beautiful Bill Firewall
Just as the Patriot Act was framed as a protective measure in the wake of crisis—intended to safeguard citizens but later revealed to enable sweeping surveillance—the integration of brain-monitoring wearables under the guise of health tech carries a similar double edge. While its stated purpose is wellness and safety, the latent power to decode and steer thoughts opens a quiet door to manipulation. What begins as a biometric Fitbit for your brain can easily become a psychological Patriot Act, where the pretext of care masks a structure of control.
These technological advancements also intersect with legislative efforts, such as the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which aims to regulate biometric data collection and protect individuals from unauthorized surveillance and manipulation. As consumer devices gain the ability to monitor neural activity, ensuring robust safeguards and transparent policies becomes essential.
If emotional and psychological manipulation via neurodata is already being used by giants like Nike, Bentley, and Mars—as confirmed by EEG-based advertising campaigns—it’s safe to say we’ve already crossed a major ethical Rubicon. These companies are not engaging in sci-fi speculation; they’re deploying real-time brainwave tracking to assess your mood and reactions and then tailor content that’s engineered to hit your dopamine receptors just right. No jail time, no regulatory reckoning—just better click-through rates.
And this isn’t limited to headsets or flashy labs in East London. Meta, for instance, has long faced allegations of using ambient audio data—your phone’s microphone—to enhance ad targeting. While they publicly deny listening to private conversations, numerous anecdotal experiences (and some academic probes) suggest otherwise. In 2021, a former Facebook employee leaked internal documents indicating that inferred emotional states were being considered as variables for ad optimization. That’s marketing jargon for: “We track how you feel to decide what to sell you.”
Consider this: we now live in a world where your feelings are treated as data points. Your sighs, tone shifts, and even unspoken thoughts—captured through EEG headsets, biometric sensors, and, potentially, your microphone—are turned into behavioral predictions. Companies exploit these signals not just to sell you things, but to shape your worldview subtly and persistently.
This neurotechnology arms race—the use of LFOs, EEG wearables, and biometric surveillance—fits uncannily well into long-standing “super soldier” narratives and even more disturbingly into the quiet, ethically murky ambition to reprogram criminals or the “undesirable” through behavioral brain hacking.
Let’s start with the super soldier angle. Military research dating back to DARPA’s “Cognitive Enhancement” programs has long explored the idea of neurologically enhancing humans, including faster reaction times, reduced fear, improved memory, and hyper-focus. What does all this require? Precision control over neural oscillations—enter LFOs, EEG feedback loops, non-invasive brain stimulation. You don’t need to surgically implant chips when you can achieve neuromodulation through headphones, AR goggles, or wearables already in civilian hands. The same tech brands that used to test how much you liked a sneaker ad can, under a different banner, be used to suppress pain, boost aggression, or sustain vigilance in soldiers. From Call of Duty to classified ops, the overlap isn’t fiction—it’s a blurry continuum.
Conspiracy Theory? The Department of Corrections Is Already Doing It
In the evolving frontier of neurotechnology, one of the more controversial experiments has emerged from programs exploring behavior modification in incarcerated populations. These initiatives, often cloaked in the language of rehabilitation, involve using neural feedback devices and low-frequency stimulation to influence emotional responses and moral decision-making in prisoners. The idea isn’t new—governments have long fantasized about reforming the “criminal mind”—but now, the science has caught up to the fantasy. Trials have explored whether targeted brainwave entrainment or neuromodulation can reduce aggression, enhance empathy, or condition prisoners to associate antisocial behavior with discomfort. What used to be a trope in dystopian fiction—think A Clockwork Orange—is now being applied in real-world facilities, under the banner of public safety, as a framework for behavioral neuroscience.
While advocates argue this is a breakthrough in reducing recidivism and prison violence, critics point to the ethical minefield: Are we rewiring people’s moral compass, or simply zapping them into compliance? The deeper question isn’t whether it works—it’s whether it crosses a line into cognitive coercion. If you can train a brain not to misbehave through electromagnetic conditioning, what’s to stop that same tech from being deployed outside prison walls to engineer “better” citizens? These programs flirt with the possibility that morality itself could be state-managed, enforced not by consequence, but by circuitry. And in doing so, they raise a chilling prospect: that in the future, freedom might not be taken away with chains, but with a quiet recalibration of your conscience.
Let’s Talk Science
Low-Frequency Oscillations (LFOs) are slow, rhythmic patterns of brain activity that occur within specific frequency bands: delta (0.5–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), and alpha (8–12 Hz). These waveforms are not just background noise—they are foundational to the brain’s regulation of consciousness, emotion, and memory. Delta waves dominate during deep sleep and are involved in restoration and unconscious processing. Theta waves are associated with states of deep relaxation, meditation, and the liminal space between waking and sleeping, where the brain is more susceptible to suggestion and open to associative thinking. Alpha waves emerge when a person is calm but alert, often described as the brain’s “idling” rhythm, and are prominent during light meditation, creative flow, and pre-sleep drowsiness.
What makes LFOs so interesting—and concerning—from a technological and psychological standpoint is that they represent windows of enhanced neural receptivity. This is where science meets science fiction: if external stimuli (such as audiovisual signals, binaural beats, or pulsed haptic feedback) can be synchronized—or entrained—to these frequencies, it becomes possible to influence internal cognitive states. In simpler terms, you can guide someone into a brain rhythm that makes them more relaxed, less critical, or more emotionally open—and then deliver content designed to stick.
That’s precisely why neuroadvertisers love LFOs. They allow messaging to bypass the frontal cortex’s skepticism and go straight for the limbic system—the emotional command center. Multiple studies, including those funded by the NIH and private firms like Kinda Studios, have shown that monitoring these frequency bands through EEG headsets enables marketers to quantify and optimize emotional engagement in real-time. They can now literally measure how your subconscious responds to a Bentley ad or a Nike story and tweak the content until it gives your brain the “right” kind of chill.
LFOs are being used to shape how we feel, what we remember, and—ultimately—what we buy. However, the exact mechanisms that make them powerful for relaxation, therapy, and creativity also make them vulnerable to covert manipulation, especially when paired with AI and behavioral datasets. That’s why legal frameworks like the One Big Beautiful Bill are vital: they acknowledge that your thoughts, moods, and feelings—your mental frequency—are now the frontline of digital commerce, psychological warfare, and even biometric surveillance. If your brain has an API, someone will try to monetize it. LFOs are the API.
Neuroadvertising wearables are no longer the stuff of experimental labs or speculative psychology—they’re consumer-ready, brand-tested tools that tap directly into your brain’s electrical activity to either measure what you feel or manipulate how you think. These devices, often built around EEG (electroencephalography) technology, operate on a deceptively simple principle: the brain emits electrical signals, and those signals reveal what state you’re in—whether you’re bored, curious, engaged, confused, relaxed, or even on the edge of emotional arousal.
They don’t need to change your mind—they just need to zap you enough times to make you feel like it was your idea. ~Tore Maras
Companies like Kinda Studios have openly partnered with major global brands such as Nike, Bentley, and Mars to test wearable EEGs on participants watching ads. The goal is not simply to ask, “Did you like this ad?” but to observe—millisecond by millisecond—how the viewer’s subconscious responds. Did their alpha waves spike when the logo appeared? Did their theta band intensify when the music swelled? This data becomes behavioral gold. It tells marketers not just what works but when and why it works, creating the blueprint for an ad campaign that doesn’t just sell a product but syncs with your brain’s own rhythm. This is what’s known as measurement-driven neuroadvertising: using neural data to optimize content.
On the other hand, a darker and more controversial frontier is influence-oriented neurotech. These wearables, or sometimes even audio-visual media delivered via screens and headphones, don’t just record—they guide. By delivering stimuli at specific frequencies, such as binaural beats (two slightly different tones played in each ear to create a third frequency in the brain), these systems aim to entrain the user’s brainwaves—essentially nudging them into a desired mental state. If a user is gently pushed into the alpha range, they may become more relaxed and susceptible to suggestion. Theta stimulation may promote imaginative absorption or decreased critical filtering. This has enormous implications not only for advertising but also for education, therapy, and yes, manipulation.
Several peer-reviewed studies confirm that brainwave entrainment works, especially when users are unaware it’s happening. For example, research funded by the NIH and published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience has explored how alpha and theta entrainment can enhance memory encoding or create positive affective states. Brands leveraging this approach don’t need to knock on your door with a sales pitch; they need to put you in the right mood, and the sale becomes effortless.
This blend of neuroscience and media design is no longer a niche area. Consumer-grade EEG wearables, such as Emotiv, Muse, or Neurable, have made it accessible, while marketing firms now openly discuss neuro-UX—user experiences designed with brain activity in mind. We’re talking about mood-altering Spotify playlists, TikTok filters calibrated to maximize dopamine hits, or even VR advertising environments that integrate EEG feedback loops to personalize immersive experiences based on your neural response.
What ties all of this together is the shift from passive viewership to neurological immersion. The wearable becomes the interface not just to observe your thoughts but to guide them. That’s why the One Big Beautiful Bill is relevant here—it targets unauthorized biometric data use and foreign exploitation, but it also hints at a deeper ethical line: when we allow commercial interests to shape brain states without explicit, informed consent, we don’t just lose privacy—we lose sovereignty over our inner worlds.
What’s marketed as the future of personalized engagement may, in truth, be the foundation of a psychological feedback loop that rewrites not just our choices but our neural architecture. And if no one stops it, your next purchase—or belief—may not have come from you at all.
It Gets Darker
The power to influence the brain through low-frequency entrainment and neuroadvertising isn’t just a marketing miracle—it’s a psychological weapon if placed in the wrong hands. Once a device or media environment can modulate emotional states, induce suggestibility, and bypass rational filtering, it becomes possible not only to push products but to nudge behaviors, override moral compasses, and erode personal agency. And if you think this sounds dystopian, understand that it’s not a leap of imagination—it’s already embedded in emerging digital environments, from algorithmic content feeds to immersive neurofeedback games. What starts as optimization for engagement becomes a pipeline for potential coercion.
Consider that alpha and theta states are neurologically associated with hypnotic suggestibility. In these states, the brain becomes highly receptive, emotional regulation decreases, and critical faculties dampen in a therapeutic setting, which might be used to help someone stop smoking. But in the wrong context, it could be used to implant ideas or behaviors without the subject fully realizing it. A 2013 study in Consciousness and Cognition showed that people in induced theta states were more likely to follow ethically ambiguous instructions. Other studies have demonstrated that when emotionally vulnerable individuals are subjected to rhythmic audiovisual entrainment, their decision-making becomes externally influenceable—even without direct verbal commands.
Now pair this with an emotionally manipulative ad, tailored by machine learning algorithms trained on your past behavior and psychological profile. Imagine that ad doesn’t just sell you something, but triggers latent trauma, amplifies loneliness, and introduces an escape route—alcohol, a pill, a rope. The technology can’t be blamed, but the design can. Meta has already been caught allowing advertisers to micro-target people identified as “depressed” or “vulnerable” based on emotional language in posts. Cambridge Analytica demonstrated how psychological profiles could be leveraged for malicious purposes. Suicide prevention research has shown that suggestion alone, when delivered during specific neurological states, can increase suicidal ideation. Even YouTube’s recommendation algorithm has driven children into loops of disturbing content based on “engagement metrics” alone, including videos promoting self-harm.
Drug and alcohol abuse inducement becomes possible not because the technology can force someone’s hand, but because it can weaken the resistance they already carry. If someone is nudged into a state of isolation, flooded with dopamine from rapid content switching, and then shown content romanticizing escape, consumption becomes coping. This is not theoretical—it’s well-documented that social media addiction mimics substance addiction in brain scans. A 2018 paper in Nature Communications highlighted how emotionally-charged content paired with social validation hijacks the same reward circuitry as drugs.
Now think of what that means when content isn’t just emotional but neurally entrained to your brainwaves. If audio-visual cues are tuned to your delta and theta bands, you’re not being influenced metaphorically. You’re being touched neurologically. This raises the chilling possibility of digital environments where people can be groomed to accept mistreatment, to comply with abuse, to normalize criminality, or to silence their alarm bells when something “feels wrong.” Not because the logic persuaded them, but because their minds were primed to receive and not resist.
This is not science fiction. DARPA’s Silent Talk project explored how to decode internal speech through EEG to communicate without words. Chinese researchers have tested brainwave surveillance in workers to monitor emotional stability and suppress dissent. If a company—or a regime—can detect, in real time, when you’re emotionally pliable, they can deliver just the right message to push you further. With zero overt coercion. Just frequency. Just design.
CRIMINAL STALKING AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
When cyberstalking or gangstalking converges with neurotechnology and emotional manipulation, the consequences move beyond harassment and into the realm of psychological warfare. Someone who is already fixated on monitoring or tormenting another person now has at their disposal tools to not just observe or intimidate, but to directly manipulate perception, mood, and behavior. The same neuroadaptive technologies used by Fortune 500 brands to “optimize engagement” can be twisted into covert weapons for destabilization.
Let’s break it down. A stalker no longer needs to physically follow you or even message you directly to disrupt your mental state. If they have access to your behavioral patterns—gathered through breached accounts, persistent surveillance, social media scraping, or even commercial data brokers—they can predict your emotional cycles. Now, imagine they deploy targeted content: audio tracks, videos, messages, or ads that sync with your vulnerable brain states. If you’re most emotionally fragile at 2 a.m., that’s when the digital content appears. If you are triggered by specific themes—such as abandonment, humiliation, or failure—they can tailor your digital feed to address these concerns. The content doesn’t need to be explicitly threatening. It only needs to destabilize you quietly, consistently, invisibly.
It becomes even more sinister when combined with knowledge of Low-Frequency Oscillations (LFOs). If someone wanted to push you into a theta or alpha state—where your defenses are low and your susceptibility high—they could use binaural beats, flickering light frequencies in videos, or ambient sound design that’s not obvious but rhythmically precise. These tools are publicly available. Some are even marketed as wellness tools for meditation. But under the control of a hostile actor, they become a gateway to your subconscious.
Imagine watching a playlist curated not by YouTube, but by a stalker, using content infused with LFO-entraining beats that reinforce your worst fears, repeat familiar phrases, and display symbolic images only you would recognize. You don’t understand why your heart races. You don’t realize your fight-or-flight system is being rhythmically pulsed. You feel exhausted, paranoid, hopeless, without knowing your neurochemistry is being deliberately hijacked.
There are already disturbing precedents. In 2019, cybersecurity researchers documented cases of “digital gaslighting”—where stalkers manipulated smart home systems to flicker lights, change temperatures, or activate speakers in ways that seemed random but were intentionally designed to induce paranoia and despair. Now add neurofeedback manipulation to that mix. Add wearables that feed back your state to an attacker who can adapt content in real-time. Add the normalization of neuroadaptive ads that auto-adjust based on emotional arousal.
This doesn’t even require a tech-savvy criminal. With generative tools and inexpensive EEG sensors, emotional manipulation can be automated and scaled. An obsessed individual or a criminal network can use machine learning to build emotional profiles of targets and auto-generate stimuli to destabilize them. No physical contact. No traceable threats. Just a digital environment where the victim’s brain is constantly kept in fear, confusion, or depressive exhaustion.
The weaponization of perception itself—what researchers refer to as cognitive warfare—is becoming an increasingly significant subject of national security concern. NATO and the U.S. military have openly studied how neural and emotional manipulation can be used in asymmetric warfare. The idea is simple: if you can control the perceived reality of your enemy, you don’t need to fire a shot. The same logic applies to gangstalking. If a victim cannot trust their emotions, their senses, or even their thoughts, the stalker wins.
What makes this terrifying is that it’s not illegal to post a video with flashing lights. It’s not illegal to play binaural beats. It’s not illegal to run ads that trigger emotion. But when it’s done with the intent to cause harm, using scientific knowledge of neurobiology, it becomes psychological abuse on a scale and with a precision that was unthinkable a decade ago.
And yet, this form of digital harassment is almost invisible to courts, unrecognized by police, and dismissed by many as delusion—ironically, the very effect it’s designed to produce. The stalker intentionally erodes the target’s credibility. That’s why it’s not enough to regulate devices or social media platforms. We must confront the reality that the battlefield has shifted inside the mind, and for some, the war has already begun.
ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL
The legislative language in the bill you uploaded—H.R.1 as amended—directly addresses wearable devices, particularly those capable of collecting biometric, geolocation, and neurophysiological data. In Title II, Subtitle A, the bill mandates that the Secretary of Commerce must issue regulations requiring companies to “provide clear and conspicuous disclosure” regarding the type of data collected from devices, including “biometric data, physiological responses, brainwave activity, and geolocation data,” and how this data is used, stored, or shared .
The legislation explicitly calls out concerns regarding “neurotechnology and brain-computer interface-enabled wearables,” requiring oversight to prevent the “unauthorized collection or manipulation of neurological data.” This includes technologies that can monitor or influence emotional or cognitive states. The bill also prohibits the use of such devices, platforms, or software developed or controlled by foreign adversaries. It notes that “wearable devices integrated with neural interfaces or emotion-recognition systems shall not be sourced from entities controlled, funded, or influenced by adversarial nations,” citing national security grounds .
Further, it treats such data as sensitive as communications metadata, placing it within the scope of technologies that could be exploited for surveillance or manipulation. This positions the bill as a significant first step toward regulating neuroadvertising and wearable-induced behavioral engineering.
So yes—the “One Big Beautiful Bill” does, in legislative terms, say: you can’t just walk around brain-jacking people through their headsets, especially if you’re working for a foreign state.
Yes—this bill is more than just a regulatory framework. It’s an indirect confession that the ability to read, influence, and manipulate your emotional and cognitive state through wearable technology is not theoretical—it’s operational, profitable, and already in use. The language doesn’t describe far-off possibilities; it wrestles with present-day risks of biometric surveillance, neural exploitation, and foreign-controlled platforms that can hijack not just your data, but your state of mind. By requiring disclosures about brainwave data and restricting foreign access to devices that tap into your emotional circuitry, the government is acknowledging what many have feared: your body, your moods, even your thoughts have become a data stream for sale. They’re not just watching what you do—they’re watching how you feel about it, and using that to shape what comes next. It’s no longer sci-fi. It’s sci-fact, hidden in a policy document. OPEN MIND hits different.
PROTECTION?
Protecting oneself from neuropsychological manipulation in a world where perception is the battlefield requires more than firewalls and privacy settings—it demands mental vigilance and a new kind of self-defense rooted in awareness. Because when the military has spent decades refining mind-influence technologies, and adversaries like China are developing so-called supersoldiers with enhanced neurobiological control, it’s not just warfighters who are being targeted anymore. Civilians are now test subjects in a live social experiment where mood, memory, and even collective behavior can be nudged invisibly, especially during protests or emotionally charged events.
This isn’t just speculative. During the Hong Kong protests, eyewitnesses and independent journalists described strange disorientation and cognitive dullness sweeping through crowds, particularly following the appearance of certain surveillance drones or the deployment of unexplained sound-based dispersal tools. Some believed these weren’t just sonic weapons in the conventional sense, but targeted infrasonic pulses meant to interfere with concentration, decision-making, and emotional regulation. These pulses operate in the same sub-20Hz range as brainwaves responsible for fear and anxiety. The outcome wasn’t necessarily mass terror—it was confusion, fragmentation, and silence. Not repression by force, but by psychological fog.
The U.S. military has openly invested in non-lethal directed energy weapons that can influence neural activity, including systems that can beam a voice directly into someone’s skull using microwave auditory effect technology. What was once developed to incapacitate enemy combatants is now relevant in a world where civilians walk around with devices on their heads and wrists that emit pulses, monitor mood, and report location. In this environment, protecting yourself doesn’t just mean protecting your data; it also means protecting your privacy. It means fortifying your consciousness.
Those who understand what’s being done can begin to resist it. Once you see the mechanisms—once you feel how a piece of content hijacks your emotions, how a binaural beat shifts your mental state, how repeated imagery implants despair—you begin to reclaim agency. That’s the difference between being influenced and being manipulated: awareness. It’s no coincidence that authoritarian regimes always seek to drown dissent not by censorship alone, but by flooding the environment with confusion, fatigue, and narrative overload. When you cannot trust what you see, hear, or feel, control becomes effortless.
But humans have always had one asset that cannot be programmed: the will to resist once they realize they’re being played. That’s the purpose of this conversation. The manipulation is real. The technology is here. It’s being used not only in warfare, but also in advertising, political influence, and social control. Yet knowledge—truly embodied, felt, and understood-is still the ultimate countermeasure. The body may respond involuntarily to stimuli, but the conscious mind, when trained and vigilant, can begin to reject what doesn’t belong.
So, how many companies are doing this without punishment? Likely hundreds, if not more. Because it’s not illegal—yet —laws have lagged decades behind the rapid development of neurotech. Regulatory bodies are still trying to classify cookies correctly, while advertisers are already reading beta waves. That’s why the One Big Beautiful Bill is such a crucial intervention: it acknowledges, finally, that data isn’t just about what you click—it’s about who you are, how you feel, and how manipulable you might be.
We’re no longer in a free market of products. We’re in a market of minds—and right now, yours is open for business. ~Tore Maras
Imagine a world where your thoughts are no longer entirely your own—where your emotions, reactions, and decisions can be gently nudged, day by day, until you’re no longer sure where you end and the programming begins. In this world, a government or corporation armed with neurotechnology doesn’t need to threaten or punish you to gain compliance; it only needs to stimulate the right frequency, reward the right behavior, and dull the parts of you that resist. You smile more, not because you’re happy, but because your brain’s been taught to associate obedience with pleasure. You show up to work, consume the content, buy the products, support the narrative—never questioning why, because the part of you that once asked “why” has been quietly rewired. This is not the future of mindless labor—it’s the future of smiling servitude, where your exploitation isn’t enforced with force, but felt as fulfillment. When they own your neural rhythms, they don’t just rent your time—they lease your soul.
How much do you trust those who GOVERN you?
Ultimately, this is not just about headsets, pulses, or patents. It’s about reclaiming the one domain that tyrants, corporations, and machines all desperately want to own: your inner world. If someone else can control what you feel, what you want, and what you fear, then they don’t need to control anything else. But if you take that back, even just a little, you remind the system that it still hasn’t cracked the code. The soul is not programmable. They are trying. And that’s where the fight begins.
If you like my work, you can tip or support me via TIP ME or subscribe to me on Subscribestar! You can also follow and subscribe to me on Rumble and Locals or subscribe to my Substack. I am 100% people-funded. www.toresays.com
Digital Dominion Series is now on Amazon: VOLUME I, VOLUME II, and Volume III – and Pre-order for Digital Dominion Volume IV is now on sale.
