Foreign aid has long been positioned as a compassionate and global development tool. It’s been branded to empower disadvantaged nations, resolve food insecurity, and bolster fragile economies. But what if, instead of being a solution, foreign aid is the very thing perpetuating dependency, compromising national security, and enabling systemic corruption?
This isn’t about treading lightly or framing polite arguments. Let’s address the elephant in the room with bold clarity: foreign aid, mainly when flowing into infrastructures like the United Nations via mechanisms like the China Fund, is no altruistic gesture. It’s part of a calculated design—a geopolitical chessboard where sovereignty is sacrificed in exchange for dependency.
Here’s why ending foreign aid might ultimately be the most radical but necessary step we need to take to protect autonomy, security, and absolute independence.
The Trojan Horse of China’s Foreign Aid Strategy
For decades, aid has been leveraged as a weapon of influence. Nowhere is this more pronounced than in China’s strategic maneuvers within global organizations like the United Nations and its subsidiary agencies. By pumping billions into initiatives under the façade of South-South Cooperation (SSC), the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has taken layers of control with calculated finesse.
The China Fund and Its Double-Edged Sword
The China Fund, established under the banner of the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) South-South Cooperation initiative, claims to deploy resources for agricultural advancements and poverty alleviation in developing nations. Since its rise in 2009, it has funded irrigation projects, boosted agricultural productivity, and fostered global food security—or so it claims.
Here’s the cold reality. These investments, often seen as acts of goodwill, embed countries into Chinese supply chains. They aren’t lifting these nations into self-reliance by integrating their farms and food systems with Chinese agro-tech, seeds, and logistical networks. They’re shackling them with financial obligations and technological dependencies.
For instance:
- Phase I (2009): $30 million flowed into the FAO-China SSC Program.
- Phase II (2015): Another $50 million was added.
- Phase III (2020): China committed to an additional $50 million to integrate development into the goals of Agenda 2030.
The grand narrative? “Helping developing nations.” The fine print? Dependency disguised as partnership.
Critical Implications for National Security
China’s economic strategy is not rooted in benevolence; it’s a masterpiece of soft conquest. By playing the long game, China has embedded itself strategically within global governance, from food systems to aviation and telecommunications. For example:
- Through its global push for agrotech, drones, and irrigation projects, China subtly collects data on critical infrastructure in recipient nations—information that compromises sovereignty in exchange for technical “assistance.”
- U.N.-affiliated agencies like the FAO, ICAO (aviation organizations), and WHO have shown how Beijing’s monetary investment wins leadership roles, policy influence, and even narrative control.
Consider this stark hypothetical—what happens when a Chinese-funded port or agricultural system fails to produce a payment from a debtor nation? Assets are seized. Sovereignty is lost. Debt transforms into dominance.
Do these nations realize the cost of their “deals” with China? Or perhaps the real question is, do they have a choice?
China’s Stronghold Over International Governance
Through calculated financial entrenchment across international institutions, China’s influence has shifted global power dynamics, often at the expense of Western agendas and accountability.
- Under Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, current Director-General of the WHO, China’s backing has effectively allowed it to weaponize health diplomacy. From vaccine rollouts to COVID-19 response strategies, these initiatives often prioritized loyalty to Beijing over independent science or global unity.
- The FAO, led by China-backed Qu Dongyu, is now a pivotal power accelerator for Beijing’s geopolitical strategies under the thin veil of agricultural development.
This soft conquest isn’t a slow burn into the shadow of manipulation—it is manipulation. Aid becomes economic entrapment, governance lapses into dictated compliance, and nations surrender without a single battle fought.
Why Foreign Aid Must End
Dependency Eradicates Sovereignty
Aid mechanisms laden with conditionalities, political agendas, or economic ties create long-term dependencies. When a nation sacrifices self-reliance for immediate monetary relief, it surrenders its autonomy. Ethiopia’s dependence on Chinese aid for agricultural modernization is a prime example of progress that came at the cost of unsustainable debt and national security threats.
Aid Enables Corruption
Tales of mishandled funds within large organizations are hardly new. Aid inflows fuel governance misconduct, bypassing transparency and accountability mechanisms. Beth Bechdol and her links to unscrutinized fund distributions under FAO resemble the fingerprints of unchecked funneling—what many argue operates disturbingly like laundering taxpayer money under the guise of global solidarity.
National Security Threats
Technological breakthroughs in drone surveillance exported through “aid programs” do more than boost innovation. They expose vulnerabilities. Chinese-funded assistance comes wrapped with hidden network access points or surveillance conduits that grant Beijing extensive infiltration into critical national infrastructures.
Alternative Paths to Sustainable Global Development
Foreign aid in its current state does not work. But eliminating it isn’t synonymous with ignoring global crises. The solution lies in fostering empowerment without entrapment:
- Direct Investment Over Aid: Instead of one-sided donor-beneficiary frameworks, replace foreign aid programs with direct-equity partnerships involving mutual investment terms.
- Strengthen National Infrastructure Independently: Encourage investments that develop localized industries and agriculture without external dependencies.
- Limit Influence by Rogue Players: International organizations must establish funding caps and influence safeguards to prevent opportunistic nations from leveraging them.
Unmasking the Ultimate Takeaway
China didn’t just buy a seat at the global table. Today, China has become the table, dictating whose voices are heard and what solutions are viable. Through entities like the FAO and WHO, it amplifies its economic warfare into policy dominance, all while wearing the cloak of development assistance.
Ending foreign aid begins with acknowledging that what was once crafted in the spirit of global cooperation has evolved into an insidious system of control, corruption, and dependency. Policymakers, international aid organizations, and engaged citizens must unite, reject the façade, and craft a new path forward.
The stakes are too high for complacency. It’s time to rethink the mechanisms of global development and dismantle those that perpetuate cycles of dysfunction.
Because dependency isn’t aid, it’s modern-day subjugation.
Tore Maras
If you like my work, you can tip or support me via TIP ME or subscribe to me onSubscribestar! You can also follow and subscribe to me on Rumble and Locals or subscribe to my Substack. I am 100% people-funded. www.toresays.com
IC: Intelligence Community; FP: Foreign Policy
