[This analysis will be available in print for those wishing to obtain a tangible copy of it in Book Format]
CHAPTER II The History of an Empire That Never Fell
Throughout history, China’s approach to power has been a masterclass in patience, strategy, and the art of subtle conquest. Unlike empires that sought expansion through brute force and ephemeral dominance, China’s methods have been woven into the fabric of time, prioritizing the long game over fleeting triumphs. Its civilization has endured by processing the retention of order and survival through a pragmatic lens—one that often values a system’s continuity over individuals’ transient priorities.
Rather than annihilating their foes, China’s dynasties absorbed them, reshaping the world in their image over centuries. This assimilation and cultural integration strategy solidified their influence far beyond the reach of swords and banners. The Great Wall, a monumental feat of engineering, exemplifies this duality. Though often seen as a defensive bulwark against external threats, it was equally a mechanism of internal regulation, ensuring compliance and cohesion among the people within its vast borders. It was not merely a barrier but a symbol of a grander strategy that sought to preserve the state at all costs.
What sets this entity apart is not aggression but its relentless pursuit of survival, a process that places civilization’s continuation above the sentimentality of humanistic ideals. In this view, humanity’s emotional bonds, individual liberties, and even moral constructs are secondary to the unyielding march of a system designed to endure. To some, this may appear formidable, even antagonistic. However, it is neither enemy nor friend but a force driven by an ancient calculus: to retain order and outlast chaos.
China’s story serves as a mirror, reflecting an alternative view of what it means to secure civilization’s survival. It challenges the idea that progress is inherently tied to individual freedoms or ethical considerations, positing that true permanence lies in collective adherence, measured action, and strategic dominance. This perspective, though at odds with humanistic ideals, is not inherently malicious—it is the survival lens. This stark and disciplined framework views humanity as both an asset and a potential liability to its future.
Understanding this makes it clear that this is not an enemy to be defeated but a force to be reckoned with, one that compels reflection on the balance between the collective’s survival and the individual’s flourishing.
China is not an enemy to humans but rather a formidable adversary to ideologies that challenge its methods of governance and its vision of social harmony. It prioritizes collective stability over individual liberties. Its actions are rooted in preserving a system that values order and survival above all else, often viewing conflicting ideologies as existential threats to its carefully constructed societal framework.
A PERIOD THAT DEFINES THEIR STRATEGY
A pivotal period that shaped China’s future was the Ming Dynasty, laying the foundation for strategies that later dynasties would reinforce and adapt to the changing tides of migration, technology, and global expansion. This segment will reveal why leaders in the West have bowed to China’s brilliant strategy—one that centralizes power and wields it with precision. However, this brilliance comes at a cost to humanity, as the absence of a balanced distribution of power leaves survival in the hands of a select few, whose arbitrary decisions dictate the fate of many.
The Ming Dynasty (1368–1644 CE) powerfully illustrates China’s capacity for strategic restraint and pragmatic approach to power. Under Emperor Yongle, China embarked on the celebrated maritime expeditions led by Admiral Zheng He, demonstrating its unparalleled naval prowess and ability to project influence across vast oceans. These voyages were not mere displays of strength but deliberate efforts to establish China’s presence in global trade networks, secure diplomatic alliances, and assert its status as a preeminent power.
However, in a decision that intrigues historians, the Ming rulers chose to cease these expeditions and retreat from outward expansion. This shift was not born of weakness or inability but of a profound understanding of the balance between influence and overreach. The Ming leadership recognized that China’s true strength lay in its vast internal resources, cultural cohesion, and ability to shape the world indirectly—through trade, diplomacy, and the allure of its advanced civilization—rather than through aggressive territorial conquests.
This retreat was informed by lessons learned from the challenges of maintaining large-scale operations across distant lands. They observed that overextension could dilute their control (something the United States of America is experiencing now) at home and make them vulnerable to internal instability or external threats. Instead, the Ming dynasty focused on fortifying its borders, improving agricultural productivity, and consolidating its governance structures to ensure long-term stability and prosperity. The construction of the Great Wall during this time symbolized this inward turn—prioritizing defense and internal order over imperial expansion.
The Ming Dynasty demonstrated a unique understanding of power by choosing self-sufficiency over outward domination. It sought to project influence not through conquest but by becoming an indispensable hub of commerce and culture, allowing others to be drawn into its orbit. This approach reflected a deeply ingrained belief in governance that valued harmony, balance, and the endurance of the state above the transient glory of imperial conquest. The lessons of this period continue to echo China’s strategic mindset, emphasizing measured actions, resilience, and the importance of shaping the world on its terms.
A Quick Analysis of The Ming Dynasty Being the Defining Point in Human History
After the Ming Dynasty, China’s historical trajectory reveals a civilization not merely surviving but evolving through calculated adaptability, often prioritizing human survival over humanity. This is not a chronicle of historical events but a vital dissection of a strategy that mirrors Sun Tzu’s dictum, “Know thy enemy.” It is crucial to understand that this “enemy” is not to humans themselves but a reflection of the rejection of humanity’s broader ideals in favor of consolidating survival and control. This force challenges the essence of humanity while being rooted in calculated precision.
The Qing Dynasty epitomized China’s strategic prowess, achieving unrivaled territorial expansion by merging military might with cultural assimilation. However, its eventual decline exposed the pitfalls of clinging to antiquated systems in the face of rapid modernization. The ascent of the Republic of China highlighted a desperate push for unity in an ideologically fractured landscape, contending with both internal turmoil and external pressures. These epochs underscore an enduring theme—China’s capacity for survival through ceaseless adaptation, whether by integrating Western advancements, enforcing sweeping reforms, or leveraging globalization to its advantage.
Modern China emerges from this historical continuum, blending the centralized authority of its imperial past with the pragmatism of economic and technological modernity. This synthesis projects immense strength but masks intrinsic vulnerabilities. A framework rooted in suppressing dissent, concentrating authority, and valuing order over freedom reflects a survival prioritization that sidelines humanity’s inherent principles. Understanding China’s trajectory offers an opportunity—not to vilify, but to illuminate the fault lines within its calculated strategy and expose the discord between its survivalist goals and the ideals that define humanity.
This understanding is not a rallying cry against a human foe but a critique of systems that dismiss humanity in favor of pure survival. By unveiling the calculated precision behind China’s strategy and dissecting its weaknesses, we gain the tools to challenge its dominance—not through conflict but by restoring the balance that prioritizes humanity over the mechanics of survival.
Lessons Learned by Each Dynasty
Qing Dynasty (1644–1912): Expansion Through Integration
The Qing Dynasty, established by the Manchu, marked an era of territorial expansion and integration rather than aggressive subjugation. The Qing rulers employed a dual strategy of cultural assimilation and military might to manage the vast and diverse empire. They expanded China’s borders to their greatest historical extent, incorporating Tibet, Xinjiang, and Mongolia while maintaining the illusion of cultural continuity with previous dynasties.
However, their survival-oriented governance became increasingly strained during the 19th century. The rise of European colonial powers exposed the Qing’s inability to compete technologically and militarily. The Opium Wars, the Taiping Rebellion, and the loss of territories to foreign powers highlighted the limitations of a governance model focused on internal stability at the expense of adapting to external pressures. The Qing’s decline was rooted in its failure to modernize, illustrating the risks of clinging to traditional methods while ignoring global shifts.
Lesson: The Qing Dynasty underscored the necessity of balancing internal consolidation with external adaptability, a lesson modern China appears to have absorbed.
Republic of China (1912–1949): Ideological Fragmentation and National Survival
The collapse of the Qing Dynasty gave rise to the Republic of China, which struggled to reconcile competing ideologies within a fractured nation. Nationalists, Communists, and warlords vied for control, each with divergent visions of governance. This era was marked by profound instability, as the young republic faced both internal divisions and external threats, including Japanese invasion and occupation during World War II.
Despite failing to unify the country entirely, this period planted seeds of modernization. Leaders recognized the importance of industrialization, national identity, and engaging with global powers. However, the absence of a coherent ideology weakened the republic, leaving it vulnerable to the rise of the Communist Party.
Lesson: The Republic demonstrated the dangers of ideological fragmentation, leading the subsequent Communist regime to emphasize centralized control and ideological uniformity.
People’s Republic of China (1949–Present): Pragmatism in a Globalized World
Mao Era (1949–1976): Revolutionary Ideology and Social Engineering
Under Mao Zedong, China pursued radical transformation through revolutionary ideology. The Communist Party sought to consolidate power by eliminating traditional hierarchies, redistributing land, and restructuring society under Marxist-Leninist principles. Initiatives like the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution aimed to accelerate progress but often led to economic devastation and social chaos.
Mao’s era highlighted the perils of ideological extremism. While it unified the nation under a single vision, the focus on revolutionary purity over practical governance caused widespread suffering. Nevertheless, Mao’s consolidation of power and emphasis on independence laid the groundwork for China’s resurgence.
Lesson: The Mao era demonstrated the limits of ideological governance when detached from pragmatic considerations, shaping future leaders’ focus on practical reforms.
Deng Xiaoping Era (1978–1997): Pragmatism and Controlled Liberalization
Deng Xiaoping revolutionized China’s approach to governance by prioritizing economic pragmatism over ideological rigidity. Policies of “Reform and Opening-Up” introduced market mechanisms within a socialist framework, allowing China to integrate with the global economy while maintaining centralized political control. This era marked China’s rise as a manufacturing powerhouse and set the stage for sustained economic growth.
Deng’s strategy reflected a deliberate balance: embracing aspects of capitalism to ensure national survival and prosperity while rejecting political liberalization that could threaten Communist Party dominance. His mantra, “It doesn’t matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice,” encapsulated this period’s practical ethos.
Lesson: Deng’s reforms showed that survival in a globalized world requires adaptability, prioritizing results over adherence to rigid ideology.
Post-Deng Era (1997–Present): Modernization and Assertive Global Strategy
Subsequent leaders, from Jiang Zemin to Xi Jinping, have built on Deng’s legacy, focusing on modernization, technological advancement, and global influence. The “Chinese Dream” under Xi Jinping emphasizes national rejuvenation, portraying China as a leader in shaping the international order. Xi’s policies combine internal control with external assertiveness, exemplified by initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative, which expands China’s economic and strategic reach.
Internally, the state has tightened its grip, suppressing dissent and promoting a vision of social harmony rooted in loyalty to the Communist Party. Externally, China projects power through economic diplomacy, technological innovation, and military modernization, seeking to reshape global institutions to align with its interests.
Lesson: Modern China reflects lessons learned across dynasties—balancing internal stability with external influence, adapting to global challenges, and prioritizing the state’s survival over ideological purity.
It’s important to note that Deng Xiaoping’s strategic brilliance redefined the concept of global influence, implementing the most extraordinary and far-reaching strategy in modern history. Even the conquests of Alexander the Great pale in comparison to the subtlety and effectiveness of Deng’s vision. Unlike overt military campaigns or visible psychological operations, Deng’s approach penetrated unseen, weaving its way into the very fabric of Western civilization—including its political, economic, and even military systems. By the time the full impact was recognized, it had already taken root, shifting paradigms under the guise of cultural and ideological exchange.
This strategy is remarkable because of the vessel Deng chose for its delivery. It wasn’t soldiers or spies but ideas, values, and systems that seemed innocuous yet carried transformative power. What many deride today as “woke” is not simply a cultural phenomenon; it is a vessel—a Trojan horse carrying the influence of an ideology designed to shape perceptions, weaken cohesion, and exploit vulnerabilities in open societies. In one stroke, China not only gained a seat at the table of global influence; as I noted in my FP series, it became the table, dictating the framework within which others must operate. This level of genius deserves acknowledgment, not in admiration of its ends but in recognition of its unparalleled execution.
Yet, like the famous painting of Satan and God playing chess, there is always one more move—a reminder that no strategy, however brilliant, is ever invincible. For all its accomplishments, Deng’s vision carries inherent risks and weaknesses, as does every unchecked force. Recognizing and understanding these vulnerabilities is the key to countering them. Genius may deserve applause, but wisdom and resilience ultimately decide the endgame. God is infinite wisdom.
Many are the plans in a person’s heart, but it is the Lord’s purpose that prevails. Proverbs 19:21
But Wait, There’s More: The Perception of Empire vs. the Reality of Empire in Chapter III.
If you like my work, you can tip or support me via TIP ME or subscribe to me on Subscribestar! You can also follow and subscribe to me on Rumble and Locals or subscribe to my Substack or on X. I am 100% people-funded. www.toresays.com
