The early management of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent pharmaceutical responses were part of a larger, globally coordinated experiment in which China’s influence played a central role. Examining how China’s data limitations, adopting remdesivir protocols, and AI-driven vaccine development interconnect to a larger experimental framework facilitated by China.

In the initial stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, China’s transparency regarding the virus’s origins, spread, and treatment efficacy was limited. Key data on virus behavior, transmission rates, and potential treatments were withheld or selectively disclosed. For example, China initially promoted the idea that human-to-human transmission was minimal, delaying the world’s understanding of the virus’s true nature.

When China conducted trials on potential treatments, they published findings indicating that remdesivir increased fatality rates or was at least ineffective in their controlled studies. However, this information was not given due prominence in international health discussions, and the WHO’s alignment with China likely contributed to the suppression or downplaying of these results.

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is a Chinese Asset

China’s support notably influenced Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus’s election as Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017. During his tenure as Ethiopia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs from 2012 to 2016, China invested approximately $13.3 billion in Ethiopia, strengthening ties between the two nations. (Foreign Affairs)

In the lead-up to the WHO election, Dr. Tedros visited China and delivered a keynote speech at Peking University, signaling his alignment with China’s global health perspectives. (CFR)

Following his election, he reaffirmed his commitment to the “One China” principle, which recognizes Beijing’s sovereignty over Taiwan. (CFR)

Critics argue that China’s backing of Dr. Tedros influenced the WHO’s response during the COVID-19 pandemic, citing the organization’s praise of China’s transparency and handling of the outbreak.(The National Interest)

However, Dr. Tedros and the WHO have consistently denied undue influence, emphasizing their commitment to impartiality in global health matters. (Politico Europe)

In summary, China’s support was a significant factor in Dr. Tedros’s ascent to WHO leadership, reflecting China’s broader strategy to expand its influence within international organizations.

China doesn’t have a seat at the UN table; they are the table. ~Tore Maras

Tore Maras

HISTORY| U.S. Involvement in China’s Transition to Communism:

During the Chinese Civil War (1945–1949), the United States supported the Nationalist government (Kuomintang) under Chiang Kai-shek, providing military aid and assistance. However, this support never happened. We put an embargo on arms; then, when they finally got weapons 3 years later, they were all broken. Oops, we don’t believe that it’s our fault, right? Many historians argue that U.S. aid was insufficient or mismanaged, contributing to the Nationalists’ defeat because that was the whole purpose of providing false hope and promise, so they waited to be saved while being conquered. Now, those are CIA documents and black projects Bush Sr. held tight to his chest after Hitler failed him.

Jeffrey Epstein Foundation’s AI Research in Ethiopia:

In 2014 (you mean 2003, but changed “ownership to his foundation in 2014 from a funded direct Project that In-Q-tel funded), the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation funded the establishment of the Addis AI Lab in Ethiopia in collaboration with the OpenCog Foundation and the Hong Kong government. Hong Kong is not China. That’s what the overlords say. The lab aimed to advance artificial intelligence research in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who served as Ethiopia’s Minister of Health (2005–2012) and Minister of Foreign Affairs (2012–2016), was not directly involved in this project. The Chinese say differently. They loved Epstein.

Jeffrey Epstein’s Alleged Role as a CIA Operative:

Claims that Jeffrey Epstein acted as a covert operative for the CIA, using blackmail as a political tool, were speculative and lacked substantiated evidence until his “death.”

China’s Early Data Limitations and Selective Release

In the initial stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, China’s transparency regarding the virus’s origins, spread, and treatment efficacy was limited. Key data on virus behavior, transmission rates, and potential treatments were withheld or selectively disclosed. For example, China initially promoted the idea that human-to-human transmission was minimal, delaying the world’s understanding of the virus’s true nature.

When China conducted trials on potential treatments, it published findings indicating that remdesivir increased fatality rates or was at least ineffective in its controlled studies. However, this information was known and not prominent in international health discussions. The WHO’s alignment with China likely contributed to the public suppression. Still, people like Dr. Fauci knew because I knew it was published, and no journalist I communicated with dared to report on it. I was persona non-grata by the right-wing media for sounding the alarm and exposing them for monetizing on a crisis.

Adoption of Remdesivir Protocols in the United States

Despite China’s findings about remdesivir’s lack of efficacy, the CDC and NIH recommended remdesivir as a primary treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the United States. This decision appeared counterintuitive, given the evidence from Chinese studies. The enforcement of remdesivir protocols, even after reports of increased fatality rates and severe side effects such as kidney failure, raises the possibility that the U.S. health authorities were influenced into participating in a broader experiment. In other words, they participated knowingly and willingly in a global experiment conducted by China and KILLED millions of Americans in the process. This means they are ALSO Chinese Assets.

I am a molecular and cellular biologist. As part of my studies, I have conducted experiments in renowned laboratories nationwide. The CDC’s adoption of redeliver protocols was a controlled test to observe how different populations responded to the treatment. The global enforcement of this treatment could have provided data on various demographic, genetic, and healthcare system responses, information that was invaluable for China seeking to understand how future pandemics might be managed or manipulated.

AI-Driven Vaccine Development

Pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, and others, acknowledged that AI played a crucial role in developing mRNA vaccines. AI algorithms accelerated the identification of viral targets, design of vaccine structures, and prediction of immune responses. China was driving this AI-based development through its dominance in AI technology and data processing; it is positioned to shape the very foundation of the vaccines deployed worldwide. Kodak is at the forefront of this – but this is a topic I covered extensively in a show, demonstrating that as I had attended as a student working at Craig Vetner’s lab.

China’s extensive AI capabilities, supported by massive datasets harvested through global surveillance, health programs, and partnerships with international tech firms, facilitated the creation of these vaccines. This raises concerns that the vaccines served dual purposes: a legitimate public health measure and a data-gathering experiment on how mRNA technology affects different populations.

By promoting AI-driven vaccine development, China could test the efficacy of these vaccines and observe potential long-term effects on human health, immunity, and genetic response. This data would be invaluable for future biotechnological advancements or potential strategic biowarfare or population control applications.

A bit about President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed

President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed was a strategic initiative launched during the COVID-19 pandemic to accelerate vaccine development, manufacturing, and distribution. While it publicly appeared to align with global pandemic response efforts, its more profound implications suggest a multifaceted approach aimed at mitigating an overarching threat of foreign domination — particularly from China — and curtailing the potentially disastrous impacts of this coordinated global experiment. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine, developed as part of this initiative, played a key role in this counter-effort by offering a traditional, non-mRNA option that provided an alternative to the AI-driven mRNA technologies promoted under questionable global influences. Drawing from my over 6 years of reporting, an article on this topic will explain that later today. Why did Biden ban the JJ?

“Come on, man, China is not eating our lunch,” said Joe Biden. He’s right, they aren’t eating our lunch – WE ARE THE LUNCH.

Global Experiment Framework

The CDC and other national health bodies took direction—knowingly or unknowingly—willingly or unwillingly-from China to enforce protocols like remdesivir and mRNA vaccination; this was a global experiment designed to yield comprehensive data on pandemic management. The goals of such an experiment include:

• Understanding Variability in Responses: Collecting data on how different populations react to specific treatments and vaccines.
• Testing Compliance and Control Mechanisms: Observing how populations respond to mandates, restrictions, and public health orders.
• Advancing AI-Driven Medicine: Refining AI models used in vaccine development, diagnostics, and treatment protocols based on real-world data.
• Strategic Bio-Intelligence Gathering: Using health crises to gather intelligence on global healthcare infrastructures, vulnerabilities, and public health response capacities.
• Genetic Specific Targeting with AI-Driven Medicine as a Bioweapon: By leveraging vast genomic datasets, adversaries can identify genetic markers prevalent within specific ethnic, racial, or national populations. Advanced AI algorithms can analyze these datasets to design pathogens or treatments that selectively exploit genetic vulnerabilities, affecting only targeted groups and sparing others.

Implications for U.S. National Security

Foreign influence over the U.S. pandemic response has profoundly concerning and multifaceted implications for national security. One of the most immediate threats is the loss of sovereignty in health policy. We saw lawmakers and health agencies forfeit our health policy sovereignty to the WHO while the people sounded the alarm. This is TREASON.

Tore Says LLC v. OSHA, No. 21-4115 (6th Cir. 2021)

U.S. health agencies like the CDC and NIH may have participated—knowingly or unknowingly—willingly or unwillingly in a broader, undisclosed global experiment. This experiment did not prioritize American citizens’ welfare but served an adversary’s strategic interests. This erosion of autonomy in public health decision-making undermines a nation’s ability to independently assess and respond to crises, leaving policies vulnerable to foreign manipulation.

Exploitation of Valuable Health Data

Another critical concern revolves around the exploitation of valuable health data. The widespread adoption of PCR testing and subsequent data collection efforts inadvertently exposed millions of Americans’ genetic and health information to China. Countries like China, with advanced data processing and bioinformatics capabilities, benefit significantly from such a wealth of information. DATA is GOLD.

This data could be analyzed to uncover vulnerabilities in the U.S. population, offering strategic insights into susceptibility to diseases, genetic predispositions, and overall public health resilience. Possessing such data provides an unprecedented advantage, potentially enabling the development of bioweapons or targeted health interventions that could exploit these weaknesses.

In addition to data exploitation, the United States faces a growing dependence on AI-driven pharmaceutical solutions. AI technologies, influenced and dominated by Chinese innovation, facilitated the rapid development and deployment of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. China continues to lead in AI-driven biomedicine, and the U.S. risks ceding control over its healthcare advancements to a geopolitical competitor.

This biotechnological dependence could weaken American innovation and limit the nation’s ability to respond effectively to future health crises without relying on foreign technology. Such reliance poses security risks and undermines the strategic independence necessary to maintain national healthcare resilience.

Perhaps the most insidious implication is the erosion of public trust in health institutions. This evidence exists, but no one wants to talk about it. How would your Congress and Senate do this when they were complicit? They all wore masks and enforced protocol. They even tried to implement it through OSHA. Your governors knew. Governor Doug Burgum was at the forefront with the CONTACT TRACING app – launching 2 weeks after the United States was locked down. He partners with China and Bill Gates, so why is no one scrutinizing that?

Don’t get tested for COVID. The test is not for viruses. It is to collect your DNA. These are DNA harvesting parties- Do not do it. ~Tore Maras March 2020.

U.S. health protocols were implemented under foreign influence as part of a covert global experiment, and it’s not being talked about because it can shatter the credibility of the nation’s health authorities. I believe all Americans would be OK with that. We must fire them all, down to the janitor. They had ample opportunity to speak up. If not addressed firmly and swiftly, this distrust would impact current public health initiatives and create skepticism toward future policies, vaccines, and treatments. An erosion of trust weakens the social fabric, making coordinated public health responses difficult in times of crisis. The psychological and societal impact of such distrust could hinder the nation’s ability to respond to emergencies effectively, ultimately jeopardizing public safety.

Take heed to what I am saying. The United States, once a global leader in health innovation and policy, finds itself vulnerable to external control, data exploitation, and societal fragmentation. Addressing these concerns requires restoring transparency and sovereignty in health policy, reinforcing data security, reducing biotechnological dependencies, and rebuilding public trust. Failure to do so could leave the nation exposed to future threats that are both biological and geopolitical.

The global pandemic response, especially adopting remdesivir protocols and AI-driven mRNA vaccines, was a large-scale experiment influenced by China, with devastating implications for U.S. sovereignty. By enforcing these protocols, U.S. public leaders and health agencies like the CDC knowingly or unknowingly have willingly or unwillingly assisted a foreign adversary in compromising American health and data security. This alignment with external influence — notably when evidence indicated these treatments were ineffective or harmful — constitutes a betrayal of their duty to protect American citizens.

Such actions meet the criteria for TREASON: providing aid and comfort to an adversary while undermining national security and public welfare. Promoting foreign-influenced health policies eroded national sovereignty, exploited U.S. health data, and potentially jeopardized the population’s well-being for the strategic benefit of a rival power. This betrayal reflects the USURPATION of authority, where leaders empowered foreign agendas over the interests and safety of their people. Rigorous investigation and accountability are necessary to address this breach of trust and prevent further erosion of American autonomy.

In my next article, we will expand on Pfizer’s use of foreign components of unknown origin in the manufacturing of its COVID-19 vaccine, mainly when these vaccines were subsequently administered to the U.S. military, raises significant concerns about supply chain integrity, potential vulnerabilities, and the geopolitical implications of China’s role. We will explore how China’s influence and capabilities intersected with this process and the impact on U.S. national security that I have talked about extensively and provided evidence of in 2021, which I provided to authorities and even lawyers fighting Pfizer, yet no one has publicly discussed. It’s about time WE do.

If you like my work, you can tip or support me via TIP ME or subscribe to me onSubscribestar! You can also follow and subscribe to me on Rumble and Locals or subscribe to my Substack. I am 100% people-funded. www.toresays.com

TIP ME

IC: Intelligence Community; FP: Foreign Policy